(wow) Words Of Wonders Level 1803 Answers – Former President Trump has called for the repeal of the Constitution and postponing the 2020 election. What makes Trump’s views so dangerous? When was the constitution under siege? And how can we protect the document that is the foundation of our democracy?
Heather and Joan discuss early constitutional debates, the rocky road to the Fourteenth Amendment, and the rise of “originalism” as a theory of constitutional interpretation in the 1970s.
(wow) Words Of Wonders Level 1803 Answers
Join the Insider program to listen “Backstage” where Heather and Joanna chat each week about the news and ideas generated by the program. Go to: /history
Episode 045 Tourmaline — Art And Obsolescence Podcast
For more historical analysis of current events, sign up for Time Machine’s free weekly newsletter , a weekly article that delves into the historical event inspired by each Now & Then episode: / short
Executive producer: Tamara Sepper; Editorial Producer: David Kurlander; Sound Producer: Matthew Billy; Theme Music: Nat Weiner; Team: Adam Waller, David Tatasciore, Sam Ozers-Statton, Noah Azulai and Jake Kaplan. Now and Then is brought to you by the Vox Media Podcast Network.
And I’m Joanna Freeman. Today we’re going to talk about something I think I say almost every week. It makes a lot of sense for us to talk about it because that’s how we choose topics. But in this case, it is a big topic with a lot of meaning and significance. And the constitution is the subject. What is it? How do we think about it? What does our constitution do besides govern? And of course it’s because a post on the social media platform Truth Social took place on Saturday, December 3rd, where former President Trump posted the following, and I’ll read a sentence or two while everyone screams what it actually is. he said. So this is the full quote. “So, with the revelations of massive and widespread fraud and deception in close collaboration with big tech companies, the DNC and the Democratic Party, will you release the results of the 2020 presidential election and declare the winner valid, or will you have a new one to choose?”
And that’s the part that caught the eye. “Mass fraud of this nature and scale calls for the annulment of all rules, regulations and articles, even those enshrined in the constitution. Our founding fathers did not want and will not tolerate fraudulent and fraudulent elections. So the conclusion of the rules, regulations and articles of the constitution, that was the ex-president’s warning. Heather and I have been talking ever since about how scary it is…I don’t even know the name Heather, other than scary. You can come up with a better word than I, but it is really wrong for a former president to talk about ending the constitution or part of it. And yet there is certainly not much pressure on the right to make such an extreme statement.
Sony Gp Vpt2bt Archives
I just want to add that the right has tried to defend this statement by reading it differently than many have taken it. And what they said was that what he actually said was, if someone committed a big fraud, the constitution would no longer be strong. But of course, after posting that first statement on Truth Social, he posted another statement saying, “Unprecedented fraud calls for unprecedented treatment, and of course it wasn’t until many, many days later that he said, ‘Oh, you’re all reading this. in the wrong direction.”
The lying media gets it wrong and that’s why I read the whole thing because he said it word for word. He didn’t say ban. Some people say, “Oh, he didn’t say end, he said stop.” Which is not much better, but still, and we interpret all the possible meanings in what he said. The meaning of what he said is very clear –
What needlessly shocked me wasn’t so much that he said it, though that was shocking enough, but that there wasn’t widespread criticism and uproar over the announcement, especially among GOP leaders who tried to distance themselves. from him, if they said anything where they said, “Well, he can’t do it,” or, “He says all kinds of things, we don’t follow them.” But almost none of them, with a few notable exceptions, said they wouldn’t support him if he were on the party list because they’re actually interested in winning over their supporters. he has a voice that he really likes to throw. from the Constitution. , burn it all if?
If they don’t respond, that says something about what they currently hold as core values. And how they play with language, we’ve talked a lot on Now and Then about the meaning of words and the choice of words, and we’re in a time where words matter a lot. Was it a “rebellion” or a revolution or an attempted coup? This is another case of people using language in very interesting ways without actually saying anything. So, for example, Mitch McConnell said in response to the news on Truth Social.
Remoteapp After Windows 10 Update 1803 Are Slow And Right Mouse Button Is Not Responding (it Reacts Only Sometimes)
Anyone running for president who believes the Constitution could be suspended or somehow disobeyed seems to me to be a tough candidate to take the oath of office. as president of the United States.
He declined to say whether he would support Trump if he were the nominee. He refused, saying it was a dangerous and wrong statement and should not be accepted. He basically said, “Well, I don’t know. You’d think that might be a problem if he ran for president.
Mitch McConnell is the Senate Minority Leader, the highest position in the Senate for the minority party. It looks like people might come together. And I could only imagine how far fetched William Lloyd Garrison’s statement was in 1831 when he said:
As one does, so it is. But I can’t think of any other instance in America where someone has criticized the Constitution. In that case, he calls the Constitution a contract with death. He criticized the constitution because he said it allowed slavery. And it has the claim that most textbooks seem terrible, and the idea that you’ll burn the ground on one question or another. Literally, this former abolitionist newspaper editor, not a legislator, issued a statement to draw attention to his cause, which we still talk about in the textbooks. And here you have a former president talking not only about abolishing the Constitution, as people started talking about after he said it, but about ending it.
Age Of Conquest: A Kings And Generals Podcast
So it reflects where we are now. We always assume in our heads that there is a line somewhere that we won’t cross, and we constantly make up those moments. As you said Heather, people can certainly rally around the constitution. No.
Well, I drew the line a long time ago. I’m back and I’m not letting it go. But the reason we wanted to do a program on this topic is because, at least when I started studying American history in the Constitution, I thought the Constitution was a dry and very boring thing to learn in the fourth grade. level and did not. It always seemed to be there somehow. And the truth is, the more you know about it, the more you realize what a fascinating and dynamic document it is and how important it was to create the frames first and then for all of us to continue to act as frames. when it comes to using it and keeping it together.
So I always enjoy working with Joanna, but I especially enjoy working with her on the topics that she’s an expert on in this country. And it just happens… You should see the look on her face, she just rolled her eyes. I don’t think she agrees that she is an expert on this country, but take my word for it. But of course she’s an expert on the early republic, so she knows something about constitutions for teenagers. So first you want to give us a little background on what’s going on with the idea of writing a constitution?
The main thing to remember about the Constitution is that it’s not like an entire generation of people said, “You know what? We need a constitution. We are good. Let’s write it.” Now we have one. Go for it. It was a big thing and people didn’t do it at first. They basically supported the entry because it looked like a big Now I’m going to
