(wow) Words Of Wonders Level 1516 Answers – Casey Wayne Patterson. [00:00:00] Welcome and thank you for joining us for the next episode of this Coffeehouse Research Center podcast. In this episode, our guest hosts Ben Liebman and Mitch Theriault are accompanied by the famous writer Percival Everett. Percival Everett is an honorary professor of English at the University of Southern California and visited the center in 2022. Read our conference on the anti-fiction spin on May 13. This conversation was recorded just before the reading. We are happy to share it with you. Thanks for listening to another warm and informal conversation where we scientists have a [00:01:00] friendly chat with each other. Ben Liebman. Hello to everyone! Welcome to the CSN podcast! We have a very special episode today. My name is Ben Liebman. I am a graduate student in English at Stanford. Mitch Theriault. I’m Mitch Theriault too. I’m also a graduate student in modern thought and literature at Stanford, and I’m happy to be here. Ben Liebman. Today we are joined by an artist, poet, children’s book author, critic and illustrator, and much more. As far as I know, he wrote about 30 books. And most of them were s and his name was Percival Everett. Percival, thank you so much for joining us. Percival Everett. Thank you for accepting me. Ben Liebman. That’s why we’re getting together today for a conference hosted by CSN that you’ll read about later today, and the theme of this conference is often fantasy versus spin [00:2]. beliefs, ideas and opinions. The one who writes them with the lips of the character or the disembodied voice of the narrator. I guess my first question to you would be: What comes to mind when you think about the anti-art spin and how it might affect your work and career? . Percival Everett. The first thing that comes to mind is the mantra you heard in the movie. Something that betrays society’s inability to read and make sense of fiction. And it’s based on a true story. Used to sell movies by denying a few things. First, any story is true. And [00:03:00] the other thing is that the truth is somehow in the truth. And so mixing truth and authenticity is dangerous, but also wrong. And I don’t think the audience can do that. Mitch Theriault. I mean, abstraction is a key term you’re talking about, and I’d love to hear how you understand it. It seems like a very flexible, unstable term with so many resonances and connotations in different registers. I’m just wondering how you understand this term and its role in your business. Percival Everett. Yes, I mean, basically, you can approach the abstract. recognizable as what is; The other is the [00:04:00] abstract expressionist model you suggested, it’s just an expression of emotion. Obviously, it cannot be a pure idea because an idea, like language, is based on a representation of something in the world. My problem with both concepts is that they involve something called realism. and that’s something I’ve only recently come to my own opinion. It looks pretty pedestrian when I think about it. So there is no realistic presentation. Even when we look at events in the real world, we see two dimensions, we cannot prevent this because all we see is the surface and our mind transforms everything into three dimensions. so we can trick the eyes or mind into three dimensions in the movie. By the way, this privilege of the idea of mimesis also increases my interest in abstraction. [00:05:00] We are already starting from abstract thinking, abstract visualization. So we’re doing something different. And this has nothing to do with reality. This means that we have an idea of what reality is like. In my work, I believe I should be able to truly abstract—words—because the components of my tool are representative. Unfortunately, I can’t say what it looks like. I can’t tell you how it will sound. I have no idea if I would have known. But I keep trying because I’m mentally ill. Mitch Theriault. I mean, you put it in such an interesting way, and it seems to me that it’s so wrong to think that there is such a thing as realism, you know, for some, mimetic representation is possible. way You know, that’s a very analytical mistake. But I mean, is there a way for an author, artist or someone whose job is to create performances [00:06:00] work with this illusion or somehow overlook it? . Is there any way this fallacy can ruin an artistic project? Percival Everett. You definitely can. Let’s just say the idea of being able to take a real-life conversation and record it and just transcribe it and serve as a dialogue in a story or narrative would be really bad. Ben Liebman. I think I read it. Mitch Theriault. Warhol, right? Percival Everett. Yes. And of course, a fiction writer’s job is to create the illusion of real language. It is not a real language. And vice versa, if we memorize it. The best dialogue you’ll ever read, then we had to get on the bus and act it out for each other. People around us will think we are crazy. , because it is wrong. It really does sound right, and only right in context. Ben Liebman. But [00:07:00] is the abstraction you’re after somehow more real than these realistic experiments? Percival Everett. So you’re asking me if I know what I’m doing? But that is not me. All I know is what I think I should do. Ben Liebman. Yes, I mean, I’ve read you in other interviews where you talk about how you look for the most logical form for what you want to write. And not all forms will be able to overcome distance. And it’s really like reading most of your books. Each has a different overall approach that fits a different story. Do you think this abstract problem is the same type of problem? You just have to find the right fit. Is it even a problem that it throws the form? To the question: I am Percival Everett. I wish I could answer that. Indeed, there were a few times when I thought I was taking a step towards what I wanted to do, but fell back and realized I had failed. Now, it’s not interesting to me, and I’m enjoying this failure, in some perverse [00:08:00] ways, but it’s not coming close. My purpose: Actually, in a way, it causes me to think far from it, far from understanding it. When I think of my job, perhaps the most surreal, I always use it in quotes. Or realistic, the closest to that abstract nature to me. Although I can’t say why I believe it. I have a water pill that I think at least one person has mentioned about it. And I tried to attack the fourth wall, I tried to attack that fourth wall, but I saw that all it did was move the wall back. That’s why I didn’t succeed there. Ben Liebman. So in that sense there is no outside. Percival Everett. No, you know, here, there is no ceiling. We found: I’m Liebman. I guess the same aspects when we think of you
Wow world of wonders, wow wonders of water, 4 words answers level 1, 4 words answers level 3, 580 words answers level 17, words of wonders, words of wonders game, words of wonders online, words of power wow, wow of wonders, 4 words answers level 2, words of wonders daily puzzle answers
